• Mon, Jan 10 2011

Urban Outfitters Has a Complicated Relationship with Israel

Urban Outfitters is no stranger to controversy – last year, feminist activist Shelby Knox urged a ‘girlcott’ of the store because she deemed T-shirt slogans like “Eat less” to be hurtful to women. But now they’re causing controversy in another way. An eagle-eyed reader emailed The Gloss when he noticed that several photos from the Urban website were shot in Israel. (Since then, Urban has posted a collection of photos from their Tel Aviv shoot as well as candids taken by models on their Facebook page.) While there’s certainly nothing wrong with using Israel’s storied landscape as a backdrop for their clothes, it rings false in light of the fact that Urban’s reputation in Israel isn’t the best.

In 2008, Urban Outfitters sold keffiyehs, the cotton or linen scarves commonly worn in the Middle East and popularized by late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, in their stores and online. Available in several colors and patterns, the scarf was a bestseller until several Jewish blogs jumped on the store for selling them and accused Urban of having an anti-Israeli political agenda. Eventually, Urban bowed to the pressure and stopped selling keffiyehs, although they still sell similar products that are sometimes mistaken for keffiyehs.

While it isn’t unusual to choose exotic locations for fashion shoots, Urban’s use of Israel as a backdrop for menswear is a multilayered issue. Surely, going to Israel and spending money there means that Urban in some way contributed to the nation’s economy. However, the chain has also been criticized for not opening any stores in Israel. Due to economic and political complications, it’s often challenging for Western companies to open up locations in Israel – when H&M opened a store in Tel Aviv in 2010, several pro-Palestinian groups urged their supporters to boycott the chain. Urban does ship to Israel, however, as well as to Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Kuwait.

Can you do a photoshoot in a place where you don’t have any stores? It’s a tough question to answer, but Urban Outfitters has never shied away from challenging questions.

Share This Post:
  • RHR

    “Can you do a photoshoot in a place where you don’t have any stores? It’s a tough question to answer.” Actually, its not. Nearly EVERY single fashion catalog shoots on islands where they dont have stores (Victoria’s Secret in Fiji, J.Crew in Bahamas etc). Photoshoots have NOTHING to do with whether or not they have a store in that specific location.

    • Sneha Polisetti

      While photo shoots can be conducted anywhere, the problem that arises from this particular shoot is that Urban Outfitters has taken a political stance against Israel. They choose to economically boycott the country due to it’s human rights violations in Palestine. In light of this, choosing to host a photo shoot in Israel goes against their economic boycott policy. It does seem hypocritical.

  • RHR

    Um, how do you know they’ve taken a political stance against Israel? Did the reporter here even contact Urban Outfitters? Pretty strong claims being made here without much of proof. There are a ton of brands that don’t have stores in Israel because the country is rather tiny — that’s generally a financial reason, not politcal. It’d be helpful if the reporter actually have something to back up her claims.

  • Mike McCozy

    I was having a hard time understanding the impetus for this article until I saw the list of related topics to the right – politics, controversy, Israel… that just sounds like a recipe for a successful story. To the author’s credit, I don’t think most people would have been able to stir a controversy in this matter. Bravo! I especially enjoyed how, out of a dozen beautiful and exotic locations, you managed to pick out the one picture that makes Israel seem like a run down third world country. I guess the beach shots would have undermined the political legitimacy of an unfounded story.

    There is no controversy. There is no Urban Outfitters political stance against Israel (read the caption under the pictures in the facebook album, Sneha, doesn’t sound like too much politics was involved in this photo shoot). As RHR said, the only relevant issues are economics and a beautiful location for a photo shoot.

  • Marvy

    @RHR – THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That is exactly what I was thinking. There are TONS of fashion outlets that conduct photo shoots in locations where they don’t do business otherwise…

  • Yoel

    This is the most ridiculous article I’ve read in a while. I am a fashion photographer and I can tell you the location has no bearing whatsoever on the brand politics. It just needs to look right for what we need. And also selling keffiyehs etc are no big deal, how is that anti-israeli? C’mon people just relax, all is well!