The Daily Show‘s Olivia Munn is on the cover of this month’s Maxim. However, some people are asking that the magazine be shelved in the “adult” section (that means with the porn) instead of men’s. Though the magazine is known for their sexy photoshoots, the thing that apparently took this one too far is Munn’s see-through underwear. Which brings me to another point: why is see-through underwear a thing? I mean, either you want to wear underwear or you don’t. If you do, I assume that means you feel like having your ladybits covered up at this particular moment and aren’t in a hurry to show them off. Which is why see-through underwear makes no sense to me. You can’t be naked and not-naked at the same time. If Olivia Munn’s ladyparts wanted to be on the cover of Maxim, then she should have let them be on the cover of Maxim, instead of doing this whole I’m-clothed-except-I’m-not business. See-through underwear is for people who think they can have everything. WELL, YOU CAN’T HAVE EVERYTHING, Olivia Munn. You can’t have everything so hard that you’re making me shout. And that’s not very nice, is it?
|Gallery: Underwear That Won’t Ruin Your Day|
|British Police Officers Told Not to Wear Sexy Underwear|
|North Carolinians In Heated Debate About Whether Underwear Is Art|
Recommended by The Gloss:
What We're Reading: