Remember when we told you about the awesome woman whose joke entry to American Apparel’s “Next BIG Thing” plus size model contest hilariously skewered its incredibly offensive tone? Well, that woman, whose name is Nancy Upton, actually won the friggin’ contest, garnering the most votes by far. The Internet hath spoken!
Unfortunately, the Spandex-clad geniuses at Am Appy finally figured out that she was making fun of them and they disqualified her from winning, in addition to writing a super bitchy “open letter” to her. For a company that has no qualms about mocking plus size women even as they try to bring them in as a shopping demographic after years of ignoring them, they sure don’t know how to take a joke, do they? And they are waaaay tl;dr about it, too. Witness the super-defensive douchebaggery:
Dear Nancy Upton,
My name is Iris Alonzo and I am a Creative Director at American Apparel. Along with four other women, I conceived of the Next BIG Thing campaign for American Apparel. Firstly, we are very sorry that we offended you. Our only motive was to discover and celebrate the many beautiful XL women around the globe who enjoy our brand, and to promote the recent size additions to our collection. Nothing more, nothing less. We would also like to assure you that no one is getting fired over your stunt, as you expressed concern about in a recent interview. We are fortunate to have a great boss who trusts and believes in our instincts and ideas, and we are still very excited about all of our Next BIG Things and looking forward to meeting our new XL brand ambassadors.
Itâ€™s a shame that your project attempts to discredit the positive intentions of our challenge based on your personal distaste for our use of light-hearted language, and that â€śbootylicousâ€ť was too much for you to handle. While we may be a bit TOO inspired by BeyoncĂ©, and do have a tendency to occasionally go pun-crazy, we try not to take ourselves too seriously around here. I wonder if you had taken just a moment to imagine that this campaign could actually be well intentioned, and that my team and I are not out to offend and insult women, would you have still behaved in the same way, mocking the confident and excited participants who put themselves out there? Maybe youâ€™ll find it interesting that in addition to simply responding to customer demand and feedback, when youâ€™re a vertically-integrated company, actual jobs are created from new size additions. In this case, for the XL women who will model them, industrial workers that make them, retail employees that sell them and beyond. Thatâ€™s the amazing reality of American Apparelâ€™s business.
Though I could spend hours responding to your accusations and assumptions, this isnâ€™t the appropriate forum for that, so I will only briefly address a few issues here. In regards to April Floresâ€™ â€śthatâ€™s not our demographicâ€ť experience, I donâ€™t recall the name of the confused employee credited with saying that, but he or she was sadly uninformed, and our company certainly does not endorse their statement. For as long as I can remember, we have offered sizes up to 3XL in our basic styles, and as far as adding larger sizes to the rest of our line is concerned, if there is the demand and manufacturing power to support it, weâ€™re always game. There are thousands of brands in the market who have no intention of supporting natural – and completely normal – full-figured women, and American Apparel is making a conscious effort to change that, both with our models and our line. If every brand that tried to do this was met with such negative press, we may have to wait another decade for the mainstream to embrace something so simple.
In the past, American Apparel has been targeted for various reasons, many times by journalists who werenâ€™t willing to go the extra mile to even visit the factory or meet the people in charge. Dov is a great executive director and American Industrialist, but there are hundreds of other decision-makers in our company, over half of whom are women. I suppose you have read a few too many negative pieces about us that have helped to form your opinion of who we are and what we stand for, and perhaps this has clouded your ability to give us a chance. I get it. I read some of it too. As a creative who isnâ€™t always the most tactful and tends to stay away from the limelight, maybe I havenâ€™t spoken up as much as I should have over the past 8 years that Iâ€™ve worked at American Apparel. Perhaps I could have shed some light on some issues that have been left cloudy over the years. However, sensational media will always need something to latch on to and success, spandex and individuality (and mutton chops circa 2004) are certainly easy targets. And who knows – maybe the PR ups and downs are all part of our DNA as a company. What I do know is that after all the years I have been working for this company I can wholeheartedly say that American Apparel is an amazing and inspiring place to work. I canâ€™t speak for everyone, but I can represent of a ton of people I know when I say that we really like Dov and we passionately believe in his vision for a beautiful factory with sustainable practices. We are the largest sewing factory in North America, after allâ€¦10,000 jobs is nothing to sniff at. A lot of people would be very sad if this company wasnâ€™t around.
That said, we realize that we are in no way perfect and that weâ€™re still learning. We want to do better or differently in many areas, and we are actively working on them every day. Youâ€™re literally witnessing a transparent, sincere, innovative, creative company go through puberty in the spotlight of modern media. Itâ€™s not easy!
Oh â€” and regarding winning the contest, while you were clearly the popular choice, we have decided to award the prizes to other contestants that we feel truly exemplify the idea of beauty inside and out, and whom we will be proud to have representing our company.
Please feel free to contact me directly anytime. If you want to know the real scoop about our company before writing a story, Iâ€™ve got it (or if I donâ€™t, I can put you in touch with the person that does!).
Best of luck,
In case you zoned out about two sentences in like I did the first few times I tried to read it, here’s a summary:
1.) We’re very sorry we offended you (except we’re really not at all).
2.) The tired, condescending fatty puns were a result of us not taking ourselves too seriously.
Here is what Iris Alonzo looks like (on the left):
3.) Jobs are created by new size additions.
Red herring alert: new size additions were not what Upton was objecting to.
4.) We are retroactively disowning the employee who told April Flores fatties were not our demographic (because we’ve decided we want their money).
5.) Waaaah cry cry, why is everyone so mean to us?
6.) We’re way embarrassed the people visiting our site voted for your joke entry instead of the real ones, so we aren’t going to let you win.
You can read Nancy Upton’s smart take on the whole kerfuffle over at The Daily Beast.