• Wed, Jan 16 2013

Was It Inappropriate For Philipp Plein To Send Guns Down The Runway?

Philipp-Plein-guns

Normally, fashion gimmicks make me laugh or roll my eyes, but once in a while, I just find myself shaking my head and wondering, “Why?” German designer Philipp Plein‘s show in Milan this week featured one such stunt, and I actually still don’t know exactly how I feel about it.

During his Autumn/Winter 2013 show on Monday, Plein chose to add some controversial elements to his collection, including machine guns, balaclavas and gas masks. He also gave the shirtless models body paint messages, such as the one above  which reads, “ONLY KILL FOR LOVE” while another said “LIFE’S A GAME AND IT’S NOT FAIR.”

Freedom in fashion is all well and good — actually, it’s entirely necessary to create new things — but with all terrible shootings that have been going on in the past few months, it feels needlessly provocative. Making a statement is one thing, but fashion designers are known for trying to push buttons to get controversy (and therefore buzz) surrounding their collections. Plein, in particular is the type of guy whose ads have featured what appear to be two twin brothers making out, Terry Richardson and a frighteningly retouched Lindsay Lohan, i.e. he likes to add elements, besides clothes, that will make people stare.

But guns are different, for some reason. Like sexual violence in fashion campaigns, I find weaponry and gun violence to be a bit more tasteless since they’re both ongoing problems and to put them in a beautiful, sexy context makes them seem more appealing rather than deplorable. If both were a thing of the past, I would likely have less qualms about it, but here it just feels like a “LOOK AT ME, WE’RE SO EDGY” thing. Nevertheless, fashion is like performance art in a way, and I would likely never want a designer to be censored; I just prefer to keep weapons off the runway and out of the hands of models.

I’m very interested in how you readers feel, though. What do you think: was this a good use of design and accessorizing or in poor taste?

Photo: Getty Images Europe

What We're Reading:
Share This Post:
  • JennyWren

    I think it’s in pretty poor taste. To be fair, I have thought so before this- guns seem to be one of those reoccurring trends in fashion, apparently nothing says “I’m so edgy and dangerous” like wearing some Topshop earrings in the shape of pistols probably bought by at least five other people in the room because Rhianna has a gun tattoo and she’s pretty hot right now. I just personally don’t like guns. I can see how they might have appropriate purposes, but that doesn’t mean you have to idolize them and it certainly doesn’t make them aesthetically pleasing.

    • Samantha_Escobar

      I don’t like guns, either. I have seen photos of really old fashioned pistols that I found awesome (most of the time because they were engraved or handcarved with designs) but I have never seen a modern gun I found remotely pleasing. I think it’s just like knives, needles and narcotics; so long as they’re still bringing harm to people, they’ll be seen as edgy and therefore stylish in some way.

  • anya

    I don’ think this is in poor taste. Since he is a German based designer and the runway was in Italy, I doubt he was even thinking about America’s gun issues. Why would he be? There are other things going on in the world. There are no gun issues in Europe, where he seems to be based. If the fact that this was seen to be in poor taste to the author for reasons other than the mass shootings in the U.S., then that’s a different conversation

  • Katie

    Yessssssss it was inappropriate! whyyyyyyy why WHY.

    After 9/11 it would have seemed mildly inappropriate to dress up like Arabs so why is it appropriate to walk down a runway with guns right now?!!?!? we’re in a gun crisis for shit sake. Poor taste. Mind blown