• Tue, Feb 19 - 1:43 pm ET

Author Hilary Mantel Advocates Body Shaming, Calls Kate Middleton ‘Plastic’ And More

kate middleton

“Middleton, pictured with her perfect Barbie lavender biscuits. For commoners.”

Until 20 minutes ago, I had never heard of Hilary Mantel. So I did what I normally do in these cases and Googled her. After doing so, I didn’t recognize the names of any of her books, but apparently she’s won the Booker Prize twice, and that’s great! But what’s not so great are the comments she made about Kate Middleton recently.

It was during a lecture at the British Museum that Mantel decided to load on the hate commentary about Kate’s physical appearance — both her body and face. The following are some of the words she chose to use:

“Plastic”

“Machine-made” (In contrast to the late Princess Di, apparently.)

“Gloss varnished”

“Painfully thin … without quirks, without oddities, without the risk of the emergence of character.”

It’s hard to decide which insult I like the best! Some are boring, while others are very colorful! Oh, to choose, to choose! Are you leaning toward one more than the other?

Although her lecture was supposed to be about oppressive media coverage, and Royal Historian Kate Williams, has suggested these comments were taken out of context, it doesn’t really matter. What person runs around calling anyone those words? Especially a member of the royal family (as a Brit, Mantel should know her fellow Brits won’t stand for such slander), who’s probably as darling as they come? Even if Kate were a bitch, she still wouldn’t deserve such adjectives, but her overall niceness and her recent battle with severe morning-sickness make Mantel look like she’s a big fan of kicking puppies, and extra cuddly ones at that!

No matter what her intention for including these words in her lecture, she’s already pissed off the wrong people. Prime Minister David Cameron has said of Mantel’s speech that it was “completely misguided and completely wrong;” and the Daily Mail, since they always have a say in these matters, cited it “an astonishing and venomous attack”.

Body snarking — when will it ever stop?

Photo: WENN

You can reach this post's author, Amanda Chatel, on twitter.
Share This Post:
  • Eileen

    Okay, I adore Hilary Mantel’s books – Wolf Hall is only exceeded by Bring Up the Bodies, and I’m very picky about historical fiction and usually have no time for Tudor stuff but I can’t wait for the next sequel – and I like Kate, too. And…I kind of think Mantel has a point.

    Kate is pretty, well educated, well dressed, and slender enough that no one can ever call her fat…and yet the personality has been completely sucked out of her public persona. She may be a wonderful, warm, lively person in private, but part of her job description is to be completely inoffensive in everything she does. And that’s not realistic. I never cared for Diana, Princess of Wales, but I recognize that was at least partly because she let all her problems, her opinions, hang out, and it caught her all kinds of crap from the world. Kate doesn’t do this. It shows that she’s smart, because that’s what she has to do, but it also shows the pressure that gets put on all the monarchy, but especially the young would-be consorts. And that kind of sucks.

  • Nikola

    Yes, those comments are taken COMPLETELY out of context. So this little article and blurb is just adding to the bullshit. Way to weigh in on an issue without actually looking into it!

    Now, this is just my interpretation of what was said, but she seemed to be making those comments about the Kate Middleton persona, not Kate Middleton herself. The whole speech was about royalty, how we perceive them, how the women themselves are turned into little more than walking clothes hangers and a working uterus. These were not meant to be body snarking comments, but commentary on the whole idea of presenting an image of a perfect person, which no one can live up to.

    • Nikola

      http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n04/hilary-mantel/royal-bodies

      There is a link to what she said, in it’s full context. Sometimes it helps to do a little research before weighing in on an issue.

    • Amy

      Ugh I agree, the original article was a really interesting perspective. This Gloss article cheapens it by rewriting the Vulture article instead of actually doing a piece on the original. Annoying since we could have had a nice discussion about beauty/fashion in relation to royalty.

  • Chelsea

    You obviously have not read the entire speech and because of this have based your opinion on snippets from other articles. Why not take the time to read it in its entirety? And maybe then you can formulate an informed opinion instead of perpetuating assumptions.

    • doubleclick

      exactly…well said

  • doubelclick

    never heard of Hilary Mantel? Where have you been? Watching Kate Middleton? Hilary Mantel knows just what it’s like to be a royal consort and commented on that and only that. you have been a victim of propaganda and our charming press and you don’t know…please do not believe all you read

  • http://twitter.com/ellenkstuart Ellen Stuart

    …this 100% misses the point of Hilary Mantel’s piece. I suspect you didn’t read it, and if you did, you should read it again and try harder. (Also, if you think all Brits think of the Royals as somehow above the same cultural criticism as other public figures are subject to, you should maybe talk to some real Britons.) Kate Middleton is not an extra cuddly puppy, she’s a rich, pretty and probably perfectly nice person who, thanks to her marriage, is basically a sacrificial offering to the media. The Windsors get to live off Brit’s tax dollars, we get to talk about their outfits and chase them with cameras–sometimes to tragic results. Mantel’s pointing out some pretty twisted (and fascinating) points about history, celebrity and sexual politics …but again, only if you actually read the article.