Sexual Assault Survivors Speak Up To Remind You That Your Outfit Is Never An Invitation For Rape

steenfox what were you wearing Last night, Christine Fox (@steenfox) started a remarkable conversation on Twitter about rape culture, victim blaming, and that infuriatingly common question of “what was she wearing.” The responses that she got were just as varied as actual thoughtful people would assume, and it was an incredible display of shutting down that “what was she wearing,” victim-blaming bullshit.

As you would expect, the responses ranged from sweat pants to dresses to pajamas to jeans to skirts to basically every single item of clothing in existence. That shouldn’t surprise anyone, because there is no link between what a person wears and their likelihood of being raped. The thinking behind the “clothing causes rape” mentality betrays a type of ignorance that stems from a deep hatred of women (anecdotally, I can say the type of person who says “What was she wearing” is also likely to say “men don’t get raped, they get lucky”), and a fundamental lack of understanding what rape really is. Victim blaming isn’t just about misogyny or pinning down “legitimate rape,” though, it’s about affording the benefit of doubt to the rapist, and not giving that same benefit to the victim. It’s a crutch for people who don’t want to believe that their child, favorite celebrity, or neighbor or football star raped someone. It makes it easier to take the news in. Rape is an easier pill to swallow when she was asking for it.

This has been a pretty fantastic use of social media, which at its best represents scores of diverse voices in an organized way and allows for conversations that we wouldn’t ordinarily have access to. Fox was also remarkably measured and careful in her handling of the situation–she made sure that anyone who tweeted their response to her approved a retweet to her 16,000 plus fans. It was a consideration that Buzzfeed failed to take in their round up of the tweets, which was certainly well-intentioned but left some of the survivors feeling revictimized. It’s a good reminder of the care the media (us included) needs to take with survivors of rape, because it’s easy to revictimize, even without trying to.

You can read all of the brave, varied responses here, and share them with anyone you know who still asks “what were you wearing?” The clothing a person was wearing at the time of a rape is as irrelevant as what the victim had for lunch six weeks ago. Nothing you will ever wear in your entire life will be an invitation for rape. We need to stop asking.

Photo: Twitter

Share This Post:
    • Lindsey Conklin

      So true, especially that anyone likely to say “what was she wearing” says “men dont get raped”

    • NotReady2ShareMyStory

      This is a thoughtful essay up until the point you include a link to all the tweets. You’ve exposed all those survivors without apparently having asked their permission to do so. Is that not contributing to the revictimization? I appreciated how the body of your essay included a description of some of the clothing the survivors described wearing. You could have simply stopped with that; no need for the link. Of course, by naming Christine Fox and giving her twitter name, a simple search finds all those painful tweets. Ultimately then this is no different than what Buzzfeed did. Or maybe even a bit worse, since consent wasn’t granted by any of the survivors other than Ms. Fox. It’s a complicated issue, to be sure. And I can see you are well intentioned and trying to be sensitive.