Kim Kardashian’s Boobs Can’t Stop Competing With North West For Paparazzi Attention


Hello! Those are Kim Kardashian‘s breasts in all their substantial glory. We’ve seen them before, but they were looking particularly good and noticeable yesterday when Kim brought them out to take North West for a little stroll in New York.

Truly, Kim’s breasts are creatures of mystery. They emerge regularly, but unpredictably. This weekend she showed them off at Bonnaroo in a shirt made out of pantyhose. We thought she’d put them away for a little while and go back to some more high-fashion turtleneck crop tops, but yesterday little sister and actual runway model Kendall Jenner made headlines with a dress cut so high she flashed her whole pelvis, and then Kylie Jenner stepped out in an attention-grabbing, navel-grazing blue jumpsuit of her own.

That shall not stand. So now we get treated to an impressive display of Kardashiboob, and Kendall and Kylie get a lecture about showing up the boss.


Kardashian’s outfit is actually pretty good. She looks great doing the “sexy menswear” thing, and one cannot deny that her breasts look amazing. I mean, we knew Kim Kardashian had fantastic breasts, but in this top they appear to be defying gravity. They appear unsupported in her plunging blouse, and yet they float unencumbered, as though she were under water or in outer space. (And anyone who is still on the fence about the ASOS model with one boob shadow should take a look at Kardashian and see that can be an effect of the light angle.)

Also, Kardashian’s hair and makeup look kind of awesome, in an over-the-top, Barbarella sort of way. She looks like she’s all done up for a magazine editorial, but she’s just walking down the street pushing her baby in a carriage. It’s a whole lot of look–too much, maybe. But she’s a Kardashian. Her house words are, “Go big or go home.”

(Photos: PCN)

Share This Post:
    • Heather C

      She needs to borrow some of Kendall’s nipple tape STAT.

    • becksss

      I’m not sure how I feel about the assertion of her breasts being “amazing” and what that implies. I mean, there is no denying that they look fab, but that assertion kind of implies there are ones that *don’t* look so good? This isn’t an accusation, because I’m guilty of thinking the same myself, but it does make me think, what makes “fantastic breasts” and what then are “not so fantastic breasts”?

      • Samantha Escobar

        I think you can compliment people’s appearances without inherently implying that they are better than others. Like, saying Charlize Theron is a beautiful woman does not inherently mean that other human beings are not beautiful if they do not look like her.

      • Elizabeth Licata

        Hm. Now that you mention it, I have seen a lot of breasts of varying sizes and shapes and thought, “OMG, amazing!” But I cannot recall ever having seen some and thought they looked “not so fantastic.” I don’t know that it exists.

    • Samantha Escobar

      I’m not digging the Long Island Medium hair, but gosh, her makeup looks cool.

      • Elizabeth Licata

        I kind of love just how over-the-top everything is. It’s like it’s the middle of the day and she’s just going for a casual stroll, but her hair, makeup, and outfit are full-on Elvira, Mistress of the Dark. It’s just so weird, I can’t help but kind of dig the chutzpah it must take to just go for a walk like that.

    • Jen Pires

      wow. she has a glorious rack.

    • cat butt

      She’s vapid and annoying and a perfect example of what’s wrong with this country but GOD DAMMIT she is beautiful.